It’s full throttle on the sexualization of young people


The demon possessed oligarchs and their minions in the deep state, academia, politics and media are diligently paving the way for “P” ( for pedophilia/pederasty) to be appended to LGBTQ.  It’s only a question of time and tactics.  The perverts are coming after your kids, all in the name of “tolerance” of course.  And if you doubt this dear reader, be sure to read about “Teen Vogue” actively, approvingly and graphically coaching impressionable teens in anal sex,

Sick and twisted.  The right becoming wrong and the wrong becoming right.  The deliberate inversion of the good, true, and beautiful.  An all out attack against the Creator and his creatures.  That about summarizes the plot against normalcy and decency.




Objective reality and truth: a brief introduction


The problem today is the flight from reality and truth.  Indeed, most people don’t even know what objective reality and truth are.  In this short but important post, we will remedy that.

Objective reality is that which exists outside of our minds or independently of our senses and subjective thoughts.  Hence, reality exists independently of man; as a corollary, reality existed before man, can exist after man, and ultimately transcends man.

This has important implications.

Most importantly, it means humans don’t create reality, they discover reality.  Put differently, humans sense and think about reality.  As such, their subjective thoughts and ideas can correspond or fail to correspond to objective reality.

Where there is correspondence between thought and reality there is truth.  Where thought contradicts reality there is falsehood.  Hence, where mind meets reality we have truth.

In our next post we will briefly discuss how we can discover and know objective reality.

Until then, take the time to read the following two very important articles, as they nicely illustrate the current flight from reality and truth and set the stage for our next discussion.

Even more official lies from the US government, by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts

We’re good people, really we are, by James Howard Kunstler





David Horowitz, former leftist radical, interview on the true agenda of the Left


David Horowitz is a red diaper baby.  He was born to parents who were members of the Communist Party USA (CPUSA).  Another red diaper baby is David Axelrod, President Obama’s former chief campaign strategist – but I digress.

Mr. Horowitz, raised by the Old Left, eventually became a leading theoretician, organizer and activist in the New Left, only to repudiate Leftism altogether.  For the last 35 years or so, Mr. Horowitz has been blowing the whistle on the Left.  In particular, Mr. Horowitz is warning his fellow Americans that Leftists, who have taken over the Democrat party, education system, and Hollywood, are hard core revolutionaries hell bent on destroying American order and building a communist utopia.

In brief, according to Mr. Horowitz, modern Leftists – like Bernie Sanders and Barack Obama – are not liberal reformers like Martin Luther King or JFK.  Rather, they are neo-Marxist destroyers who are waging a slow motion Bolshevik revolution against all of the principles and practices characteristic of the American way – God, family, guns and country – with the fantastical dream of one day building a man made utopia on earth.

It’s the sin of immanetizing the eschaton.

This unthinking assault on Divine, natural and traditional order, coupled with human pride, is what helps to explain the terrifying headlines I daily encounter:

Womb Transplants for Gay, Transgender and Straight Men Who Want to Carry a Child?

Public library hosts children’s storytime led by drag queens dressed as nuns

PLAYING GOD: ‘End to sex’ in 30 years as parents will DESIGN their babies in the lab

Before watching the below interview with Mr. Horowitz, I would like to make a few points that may prove helpful when thinking about the interview.  First, Mr. Horowitz and his interviewer, Dr. Kengor, actually provide quite a bit of evidence implicating the financial elites or the oligarchs in the plot against right order.  Likewise, when bemoaning the constant failures of the Republican party leadership and the bias of the corporate media, they provide tantalizing clues of their direct involvement in the plot.  Mr Horowitz even gestures at the ultimate demonic origins of the plot.  Unfortunately, he doesn’t go deep enough and fails to connect the dots to reveal a more complete picture of the (stupid and doomed to fail) plot against the Creator and his creation.  Having said that the interview is an important one for it reveals – in a very accessible way from the mouth of a former revolutionary theoretician and activist – the true aims and tactics of the Left, the mind blowing success they’ve enjoyed, their cultural and political ascendancy, what the future holds should current trends continue unabated, and what can be done, on the purely human level, to try and return the country (and world) onto the path of right order.



Charlie Gard and the slippery slope


Principles have logical and practical consequences.  Good principles have good implications.  Bad principles have bad implications.  The Charlie Gard case threatens to replace a reasonable principle with a manifestly stupid one, with all that entails.

Pre-Charlie Gard common sense standard, roughly stated:

If a competent patient or rightful guardian has the means and money they should be legally permitted to pursue presumptively safe and potentially effective experimental medical procedures or therapies and/or die at a house, in hospice, or in a hospital.

Post-Charlie Gard stupid standard, roughly stated:

If a competent patient or rightful guardian has the means and money they should be legally permitted to ask Caesar for permission to pursue presumptively safe and potentially effective experimental medical procedures or therapies and/or die at a house, in hospice, or in a hospital.

Since Caesar tends to be a volatile and smug jerk with an ever evolving conception of reality, good luck predicting his mood and securing his permission when you need it.

Put differently, the post-Charlie Gard standard threatens to put us on quite the slippery slope, much like Caesar’s ever evolving “moral” sex standards used to justify sodomy, masturbation, contraception, adultery, sterilization, fornication, and the like has us snowballing our way into hell:

Normalizing incest and other perversions; it’s already happening



The Charlie Gard case revisited


The elites love to make things complicated, for that’s an important way they rationalize their intrusions into private life and drive toward totalitarian control.  But the Charlie Gard case is really quite simple.

Charlie is a sick patient, with a horrible prognosis.  Charlie’s God ordained and rightful guardians – in this case his two competent and loving parents – want Charlie to receive a presumptively safe experimental drug that probably won’t but may help Charlie.  The parents have found a doctor (and at least one hospital) that are willing to administrator the experimental drug to Charlie.  The parents, doctor, hospital, charitable donors, and the like will cover all costs associated with Charlie’s treatment; treating Charlie will not impose undue burdens an third parties.  All parties involved agree that the drug should be administered for three months, followed by a treatment decision – palliative care if the drug fails and continued administration if it works.

At this point, all sane people of good will would express themselves with one voice: “Charlie’s parents and willing doctors should be permitted to take one last shot, even if it’s a long shot, at helping Charlie.  In fact, people in a position to help Charlie – like his current doctors – should do what they can to facilitate his last hope at a treatment”.

Importantly, all of this could have been done four months ago and, had that happened, today the conversation would be about Charlie receiving ongoing treatment or about his dignified death in the loving and heroic arms of his parents.  As a side benefit, the cause of medical science would have been advanced.

So, why aren’t we having this conversation?  Why, instead, are we still talking about Charlie being denied even the possibility of receiving the experimental drug four months after he could have?

Because Caesar, arrogant bastard that he is, decided to intrude himself into a private family affair, drag things out for four months, and ultimately give little Charlie a thumbs down, all the while depicting himself as a compassionate and objective expert who only wants what’s best for Charlie and his deluded parents.

Funny how Caesar doesn’t get between parents and doctors when they are cooperating to kill unborn children.

In the end, it’s all about power – the raw exercise of total and arbitrary power over all life by Caesar and for Caesar.  It’s all about Caesar’s thumbs up or down deciding everything, from cradle to grave.

And if you doubt this, riddle me this.  Why, as of this writing, won’t Caesar and his goons let little Charlie die with dignity in his parent’s arms at home or in hospice?

It’s because Caesar is a power mad jerk.

Here’s another way to think about Caesar doing demonic evil under the guise of Godly good.

Nobody of sound heart and mind would accuse Charlie’s parents of doing anything immoral or sinful – of violating God’s common sense law – in using their own money to work with willing medical experts to give Charlie a safe but experimental drug for three months, with the understanding that Charlie should receive only palliative care should the drug be proven not work.  Put differently, nobody would dare suggest that God is in any way displeased with Charlie’s parents and that the Divine court finds them guilty of sin, let alone serious sin.

But Caesar is displeased with Charlie’s parents and has found them guilty – not of immorality or sin but of violating Caesar’s labyrinth of self-serving man made rules and regulations.

So, Caesar finds fault and punishes where God does not.  And you expect me to believe this isn’t fundamentally about the creature usurping the creator, that this isn’t about the will to power?

In closing, here we stand, four precious months now behind us.  Charlie still hasn’t received the experimental treatment he should have received four months ago and, absent a miracle, his parents are doomed the the kind of loving and compassionate closure that only Caesar and his objective, loving and expert henchman can provide.

Incidentally, here are some other recipients of Caesars compassion:

God help us all.


Babies to be made in labs


The ultimate goal of the elites is to usurp God and exercise totalitarian and “scientific” control over the creation, maintenance, and destruction of human life.  They want worker bees that will reproduce, work and die on command.  They’ve made considerable progress on all three fronts and have established moral, legal, educational and scientific precedents that all but guarantee their success – at least from a purely human perspective.  Here, a useful idiot of the elites, a Mr. Hank Greely, gives us a glimpse into the macabre future that’s planned for the sheeple,

Within 30 years we will no longer use sex to procreate, says Stanford Professor

What’s funny is Mr. Greely – useful idiot that he is – actually thinks “parents” are going to be the ones making the fundamental decisions about how many and which embryos to grow.




Caesar Signals Thumbs Down on Charlie Gard


Since the evidence is overwhelming, it’s a simple matter to convince people, including statists, socialists and so-called liberals and progressives, that governments are largely run by liars, thieves, warmongers, murderers, assassins, torturers, drug and gun runners, peeping Tom’s, sexual perverts and, basically, total scumbags.  Yet, the same people want to entrust totalitarian control over healthcare to them, supremely confident that everything will be hunky dory.  Go figure.

Of course, awake people know why the elites want totalitarian control over health care.  It’s because he who controls health care, especially when all moral restraints have been removed, enjoys total and arbitrary control over every aspect of life – birth, work and recreation, and death.  Now, the ultimate goal of the elites, as stated in many works of their fiction and  non-fiction, is to use health care to “scientifically” create drones, train drones, and kill drones, all for the glory of the queen.  To get to that secular nirvana, moral boundaries must be gradually and subtly transgressed, philosophical, theological, legal, and medical precedents carefully established, language corrupted, and historical memory gradually erased.  Put differently, the hive framework must be gradually built up such that the drones – to paraphrase Aldous Huxley – are made to celebrate their degradation and enslavement as empowerment and freedom.

Already, many key precedents have been set and tipping points reached, as the elites and their useful idiots guide us, with increasing determination and speed, from the culture of life to the culture of death.

Now, a favorite tactic of the elite is to use “complicated” cases that pit families against the state, and to publicly decide against the former, always depicted as emotional and ignorant, in favor of the latter, always depicted as scientific, objective and compassionate.  The sad case of Charlie Gard illustrates all of this:

The elites are also masters of controlling the terms of the debate and distracting people away from alternative assumptions and conclusions.  This is illustrated by the unthinking use of poorly defined terms like “quality of life”, etc.  It is also illustrated by things that were omitted from the discussion.  For example, in a rational and compassionate world, where all viable options are on the table, four months ago the US doctor would have been able to FedEx the oral medicine to the UK doctors where they would have been able to administered it to Charlie, without having to disturb him, and used standard medical procedures to try and manage and minimize side effects, etc.  After three months on the medicine, Charlie’s parents and doctors would have had clarity about the success or failure of the medicine and would have been in a much better position to decide on the morally and medically right thing to do for Charlie.

Instead, an inherently simple case – a patient who’s rightful guardians would like to to try an experimental, oral and presumptively safe medicine on him for three months in a hospital setting – is made “complicated” and dragged out for four months, ultimately giving Caesar final authority in the matter.  Heck, in a rational world they could have tried the experimental medication in the UK hospital, potentially helped Charlie and advanced the cause of medicine, while fighting in court.

But Caesar wants things “complicated” because he wants ultimate control over thumbs up or down for his drones and, moreover, he wants the drones to thank him for being so objective and looking out for everyone’s best interests.

All hail Caesar!



PS My title is taken from the following post at the American Catholic:


The policy stays the same


When analyzing current events and politics, we must always be mindful of what insider Prof. Carroll Quigley revealed in his massive study, Tragedy and Hope, about the elites, their globalist agenda, and their duplicitous tactics:

“The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to the doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy.”

Candidate Trump railed against the globalist push to war in Syria and confrontation with Russia; he promised a fresh approach, one that would give national sovereignty, mutual respect, and peace a chance.  This is why many people “threw the rascals out” and voted for him, despite his many character flaws.  President Trump’s administration, however, is ratcheting up the saber rattling against Syria and Russia, has upped the ante and engaged in direct military action against Syrian forces, and is positioning assets for a larger military campaign in the Levant.  Ironically, just as April’s tomahawk missile attack against Syria is exposed as a charade based on lies, the Trump administration is doubling down and threatening future military aggression against Syria and Russia on the basis of unsubstantiated allegations of “potential preparations” for a future chemical attack that would “likely result in the mass murder of civilians, including innocent children”:

“The United States has identified potential preparations for another chemical weapons attack by the Assad regime that would likely result in the mass murder of civilians, including innocent children.

The activities are similar to preparations the regime made before its April 4, 2017 chemical weapons attack.

If … Mr. Assad conducts another mass murder attack using chemical weapons, he and his military will pay a heavy price.”

-White House press secretary, Sean Spicer

Talk about war propaganda coming from a government that’s bathed the world in the blood of innocent children.  Not to be outdone, UN ambassador Niki Haley recently tweeted:

Any further attacks done to the people of Syria will be blamed on Assad, but also on Russia & Iran who support him killing his own people.

Did you get that?  Any so-called further chemical attack – one Trump’s people know is coming, presumably based on them peering into a crystal ball – is too be blamed, not only on Syria, but on Russia and Iran as well.  If that’s not beating the war drums nothing is.

All of this madness – the madness candidate Trump cran against – makes Obama’s red line look sane by comparison.  Indeed, by directly threatening military action against Syria and openly threatening Russia with future military action, the Trump administration, in direct contradiction to Trump’s campaign rhetoric and promises, has actually managed to outdo Obama, Kerry and Hillary in advancing the globalist agenda and bringing the world to the brink of WWIII.

The globalist policy is regime change in Syria, the destruction of Iran, neutralization of Russia, and ultimate advancement of the Anglo-Zionist-American New World Order (NWO).  This is all well known to all serious students of geopolitics.

Hence, we threw the rascals out but the policy remains the same – just as Professor Quigley boasted.  And as the globalist policy gets implemented, the American people are predictably being distracted by Joe Scarborough’s and Mika Brzezinski’s twitter war with Trump, the “nothing burger” of Russia-gate, the endless mudslinging derived from the false left-right paradigm, and other side shows.

One can’t help but be impressed by the globalists’ ability to reach into the same old bag of ticks – divide and distract the people – and advance their evil agenda under the guise of doing good.

Now, the question that demands to be answered is why did candidate Trump run against the globalist policy agenda, only to implement it as President Trump?  Three main explanations have been offered:

  1. Trump was a globalist, deep state stooge from the get go; he was a Trojan Horse.
  2. Trump was a nationalist who’s been brought to heel by the globalists’ and deep state
  3. Trump is a nationalist who’s still fighting the good fight but is being undermined by globalist and deep state operatives in his own administration

Frankly, (1) and (3) strike me as unnecessarily complicated and contorted explanations for the available facts.  Hypothesis (3), in particular, appears quite weak on the grounds that all of the alleged globalist and deep state saboteurs serve at Trump’s pleasure and could easily be replaced by qualified non-globalist and non-deep state actors like Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, Dr. Ron Paul, Dr. Rand Paul, Dennis Kucinich, Tulsi Gabbard, Pat Buchanan, David Stockman and the like.  Hence, by process of elimination we’re left with hypothesis (2) as the best explanation, at least for now.  Anyhow, to help folks sort through all of this, I would encourage everyone to study and think through the following articles and interviews:

Putin, China, A World At War And What Will Cause a Bankrupt U.S. To Collapse, interview with Dr. Paul Craig Roberts

American Closing in on Civil and Global War, by Pastor Dr. Chuck Baldwin

New Cuban Missile Crisis, US and Syria Now in Standoff in Syria, Alex Jones




There are only two options: freedom or tyranny


The so-called debate between Republicans and Democrats over health care has got me thinking.  Neither side is arguing for freedom in health care; both sides are arguing over different types of tyranny in health care.  And while they furiously debate trivial details, in principle Democrats and Republicans are united in seeking to grant Washington arbitrary control over the health care decisions of Americans.  And why stop with health care?  For food, shelter, clothing, education and transportation are more basic needs than health care.  So total government control over health care logically translates into total government control over just about every important aspect of life.  Hence, if current trends continue it’s only a question of time and tactics before manifest tyranny entraps us all.

In more philosophical terms, man has but two options: freedom or tyranny.  Freedom means life under the rule of God’s and nature’s law; tyranny means rule under the arbitrary will of the powerful few.  As alluded to above, there is no middle ground. There’s no such thing as coherently mixing freedom – the rule of higher law – with tyranny – the rule of human whim; the inherent contradictions in any so-called middle way must ultimately give way to freedom or tyranny.  Indeed, the so-called middle way is a ruse used by would-be tyrants to trick people into abject servitude.

In broad outline, freedom means decentralized and legitimate authority protecting voluntary and just market exchange and private charity, and also providing for a safety net aimed at empowering the truly unfortunate.

In broad outline, tyranny means the powerful few exercising total control, unrestrained by any higher law, over the lives of the multitude.

The system of freedom can only be sustained by a virtuous people – a temperate, just, prudent, fortitudinous and rational people.  The system of freedom can be likened to hearty and just men and women, harmoniously pursuing their diverse ends, served by rational, humble and accountable authorities dedicated to the common good.

The system of tyranny can only be tolerated by a blindly obedient people, by a people degraded to live as little more than bipedal cattle.  The system of tyranny can be likened to a rabble ruled by knaves, to brutes under the arbitrary control of masters dedicated to their private good.

The system of freedom can only be sustained by sheepdogs; the system of tyranny can only be tolerated by sheep.  The system of freedom means men and women empowering one another to strive for greatness; the system of tyranny means men and women reduced to an undifferentiated mass of drones who live and die to serve the queen.

The choice, then, is a simple one: freedom or tyranny.  The former means the power for men and women to do as they please, subject only to the laws of nature and nature’s God; the latter means the power of the slave-master to arbitrarily rule over his slaves.  Freedom promises happiness; tyranny guarantees unhappiness.

The genius of western, Christian civilization – most notably as expressed in the founding documents of America – provides a general road map to freedom and prosperity.  The destroyers of western civilization – the new world order globalists who presume to rule us – provide a general road map to tyranny and misery.

We are living in a transitional period, with the march toward tyranny getting faster every day.  We can choose to go back to the path of freedom or allow ourselves to be lured into the snares of tyranny.

The tragic irony of it all is the principles of freedom – imperfectly implemented as they were – produced the very advances in science, technology, education and medicine that the tyrants seek to control and redirect to advance their selfish interests.

In closing, you cannot serve two masters.  Get informed, make your choice, and live with the consequences.